Galen T. Pickett

Assoc. Professor

Physics and Astronomy

PH3-103
California State University Long Beach
1250 Bellflower Blvd.
Long Beach, CA 90840-3901

(562) 985-4934 vc    (562) 985-7924 fax
gpickett@csulb.edu

PHYSICS 151 Course Evaluation

Fall 2004

 
 
 
1. Clearly stated grading 
and course objectives
Strongly
agree =5
4 3 2 Strongly
disagree=1
N/A
19 5 0 0 0 0
Course Average:4.79
College Average:4.40
2. Consistent grading.
SA=5 4 3 2 SD=1 NA
16 7 1 0 0 0
Course Average:4.62
College Average:4.46
3. Provided useful assignments
SA=5 4 3 2 SD=1 NA
15 6 3 0 0 0
Course Average:4.50
College Average:4.23
4. Reasonable expectations
SA=5 4 3 2 SD=1 NA
7 11 5 1 0 0
Course Average:4.00
College Average:4.36
5. Instructor well prepared
SA=5 4 3 2 SD=1 NA
20 2 2 0 0 0
Course Average:4.75
College Average:4.49
6. Instructor presented material effectively
SA=5 4 3 2 SD=1 NA
9 8 7 0 0 0
Course Average:4.08
College Average:4.17
7. Instructor was available
SA=5 4 3 2 SD=1 NA
14 2 1 0 0 7
Course Average:4.76
College Average:4.60
8. Overall teaching effectiveness
Excellent=5 4 3 2 Very poor=1 NA
13 9 2 0 0 0
Course Average:4.45
College Average:4.26

Analysis of written comments:
At the time of evaluations, enrollment in the course was 48, and  26 students filled out evaluation forms.  Of those ,  22  had extra written comments to make.

There are two recurring comments. First, there is too much homework assigned in the course.  The basic idea *every* physics professor has for a course like this is that the *problems* are what teaches the physics,  so assigning challenging homework is a vital goal for this course.  I sympatize, however, with the workload complaints, and will see how both increasing the grade-weight of the homework, and in cutting down the quantity of problems will help.

Secondly, there are persistent comments on the lab for the course.  These mostly focus on trying to synchronize the lab and the lecture, but also point to the large workload the labs entail.  I'm reluctant to address the workload of the labs, but I can make a better effort of putting the lab work into the context of the lecture.

Comments made during standard class evaluations:
1. If there are going to be so many computer homework problems, then it should be weighted with a higher percent on your overall grade.  Lab instructors should give examples that are on the same subject as lecture.  Lab could also be worth a higher percentage by at least 5-10%.  Thank you very much for an interesting and attentive semester.
2. Physics 151 is a difficult course, however, Dr. Pickett was excellent in helping us understand the content.  The group exercises used during the course were very valuable and key to understanding the material.  Some of the mastering phsyics homework was too much.  The lab needs to follow the lecture.  Overall, great teacher.  Very interesting.
3. This professor is one of the best professors I had for my classes.  He explained everything clearly in the class and very helpful during office hours.  Helps our lot for homeowrk during the office hours.  The homework assignments were very helpfull and best way to practice what we learn in the class.  In class exercises also helped a lot because I could discuss problems with other students.  This was the best physics class I had in CSULB and I learned lot.  I highly reccommend this professor for 151. ... Thank you.
4. ISEE method was extremely helpful in class lectures and tests; it provided an organized and clear way of objective of problems.  Mastering physics site was difficult to learn and get used to at first but the problem sets were useful; however, the amount of problems given, per set, tend to be excessive.
5. I had tried taking this class before from another instructor and had to drop our simply because I couldn't understand what he was saying or writing on the board.  It was refreshing to have a professor whose native language was english.  It's hard in a course like this to cover so much material, and at times I was confused simply by the amount of different concepts being discussed at one time.  The lab website was somewhat useful, but hard to navigate at times.  The same goes for Mastering Physics.
6. I had a very good experience in this class.  The subject matter is very difficult no matter who is teaching it.  I felt Prof. Pickett was well organized, consistent, and did a very good job.  I would recomend to any of my friends that take Physics 151 to chose Prof. Pickett's class over other teachers.
7. Best phys exerienced.  Learned all the concepts, when help was needed, he was always there as specified during lab hours.  Very helpful, but sometimes cut time short because he had to go, but otherwise great.  Also, labs are not synchronized with the lecture.  Most work in lab was tedious and irrelevant.  We got a lot of data which was too time consuming.  Also, Mastering Physics took longer than expected.  Some problems were too difficult that even Dr. Pickett seemed to get stuck on while trying to do them, so how does he expect us to do them.  Also, try to put less.
8. Very smart teacher.  Just needs to slow down a notch.  Grading was fair.  Needs more in-class activities.
9. Professor was well prepared for class; notes were very organized.  Mastering physics was helpful and was better when we didn't get penalized for having the wrong answers.  In class assignments weren't very challenging - kind of a waste of class time.  They were just an easy way to boost our grades.  There should be more physics professors like Dr. Pickett.
10. I really enjoyed having Pickett as a teacher.  Sometimes I would get lost in class because the examples were computationally heavy and I'd forget what the overall goal of the example was.  But I thought that the way the tests were graded was really fair and helpful.  Too bad he's not teaching 152.  Mastering Physics was a great help.
11. Overall, I feel this course was well instructed and I did learn a lot from this class.  However, I think the workload outside of class was a little too much.  I feel that I wish we could have done more in-class work and less homework.  I think the Mastering Physics is a good way to assign the outside of class work, however, there were too many problems to sit down and work on.  Also, I believe we should spend more time going deeper into a few laws and theorems rather than just using them once and moving on.
12. Mastering Physics online HW was a good way to learn and understand work in this class.  However, sometimes there were too many problems assigned.  The worst was when one problem had more than E and F parts.  In class instructor was good at presenting material.  One thing I would like to see change is maybe when explaining something to somewhat face the class and not the board, just so it is easier to see the board and hear the instructor better.
13. Homework takes too much time.
14. Definitely don't make the homeowrk on the web hurt.  This site and questions are often very confusing.  Do less derriving of equations.  There's very little time in class, so more time should be spent on how things work, examples, etc. rather than derriving how to do it or how ``xyz'' came about.  More in-class assignments, but longer.  Tests are sometimes too long for the given time.  Maybe 1 ``hard'' question and one easy one.  ISEE is very difficult to understand.  We think it's too formal and spend too much time worrying about the ormat rather than the content.
15. The amount of homework on Mastring Physics was a bit much.  Mastering Physics on the other hand was great.  The lab I was in was rather pointless.  I learned nothing from class, the problems on the board and the lab rarely coincided with the current topic in lecture.
16. The problem sets on Mastering Physics were unclear at times when hints and certain algorithm was needed.  Try and explain that the 2nd book on the exam, anybody can help each other for the problems.
17. The Masteringphysics assignments had some kinks in it that still aren't fixed.  Such as revealing of answers and even plain refusal of the right answers to some of the problems.  It almost made the reasonable homework too hard.  It rose how difficult it was.
18. The problem sets were a little too much to handle every week.  I liked the in-class assignments.  More would be good so people can work together more often.  The lab could have been more synchronized with the class.
19. He was always available during office hours and has helped me a lot.  Even when it wasn't his office hours he helped me alot which shows that he cares greatly for his students.
20. The course was great - my only complaint is with the online homework.  It didn't always work and I found that it confused me more than it helped me - I think it's because the way the problems are set up online.
21. "Mastering physics" online homework was very effective in giving the students instant feedback about their strengths and weaknesses.  Prof. Pickett was clear, and accessible for questions.  Thanks!
22. I enjoyed Dr. Pickett's lectures, but I did not like the Mastering Physics website at all.  I did not feel that it was effective in teaching physics.

last updated: June 22, 2005